In a heated exchange, Tucker Carlson accuses Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu of exploiting Charlie Kirk’s assassination for political gain.
Carlson’s Bold Critique
On September 17, 2025, Tucker Carlson delivered a scathing monologue criticizing Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s response to the assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk. Carlson accused Netanyahu of exploiting Kirk’s death to further political objectives, suggesting that Netanyahu’s policies are aligned with America’s adversaries. This critique came after Netanyahu appeared on Fox News, expressing condolences and discussing his relationship with Kirk.
Carlson’s comments have sparked a firestorm within the conservative movement, highlighting the growing divide between pro-Israel conservatives and those who question the extent of U.S. support for Israel. The confrontation between a major U.S. media figure and a sitting Israeli Prime Minister underscores the complexities of U.S.-Israel relations, particularly concerning foreign policy priorities.
Netanyahu’s Defense
In response to Carlson’s criticisms, Netanyahu defended his actions and emphasized the importance of the U.S.-Israel alliance. He rejected allegations of political exploitation, pointing to his personal relationship with Kirk as a testament to his sincerity. Netanyahu’s defense has been supported by Israeli officials and some Jewish organizations, who have condemned Carlson’s remarks as antisemitic.
However, the controversy has not subsided. Conservative figures and media outlets continue to debate the appropriateness of Netanyahu’s response and Carlson’s critique. The incident has raised questions about the role of foreign leaders in U.S. domestic issues and the perception of such actions as interference.
Impact on U.S. Conservative Landscape
The assassination of Charlie Kirk and the subsequent political fallout have exposed significant rifts within the American conservative movement. Some factions remain staunchly pro-Israel, while others advocate for a reevaluation of U.S. foreign policy entanglements. This internal division is further complicated by accusations of antisemitism and the politicization of Kirk’s death.
As debates rage on, the long-term implications for U.S.-Israel relations and conservative foreign policy priorities remain uncertain. The controversy continues to unfold, with no resolution in sight and ongoing discussions in both U.S. and Israeli media.
Sources:
The Young Turks (TYT), September 17, 2025